To organize your thoughts, all you need is some listening space .. in my case this blog.
Wednesday, December 22, 2010
The first December post
Wednesday, November 24, 2010
What's up with me?
- I have been thinking all along that she likes me just as much as I like her. And when something is inconsistent with that, or when I interpret something as inconsistent with that, I feel unhappy. I have to accept whatever interaction we have as what it just is. Not add meanings to it. Too many meanings, I tell you, entirely too many meanings have been added! Layers upon layers of meanings!
- Well .. everything else I had thought of .. all basically boils down to that. Too many meanings have been added, o discerning reader!
Wednesday, October 20, 2010
Happiness & Destiny
Saturday, October 9, 2010
Relationships
Friday, September 24, 2010
The Power of Now
Saturday, September 18, 2010
Enrollment
Wednesday, September 15, 2010
Stories & Reality
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Embrace the Pain
Saturday, August 28, 2010
Good reads
The latest
Thursday, August 26, 2010
Right & Wrong
Monday, August 23, 2010
Ego(s)
Wednesday, August 18, 2010
The Awakening
Self Enquiry
The Ego
Saturday, August 14, 2010
Dealing with yet another breakdown
Tuesday, August 10, 2010
Gardener and garden
Happiness
Anxiety
Monday, August 9, 2010
Beyond the act - Thinking aloud
Appreciation
My problem in life
Exercise is important
Plans
Importance of Communication
The real deal
Friday, August 6, 2010
The red pill and the blue pill
Rackets
Thursday, August 5, 2010
The act and the ego
The Seeker
The seeker is he who is in search of himself.Give up all questions except one: ‘Who am I?’ After all, the only fact you are sure of is that you are. The ‘I am’ is certain. The ‘I am this’ is not. Struggle to find out what you are in reality.To know what you are, you must first investigate and know what you are not.Discover all that you are not -- body, feelings thoughts, time, space, this or that -- nothing, concrete or abstract, which you perceive can be you. The very act of perceiving shows that you are not what you perceive.The clearer you understand on the level of mind you can be described in negative terms only, the quicker will you come to the end of your search and realise that you are the limitless being.
The Power of Context and the Courage to Create
Joe Dimaggio, Landmark Forum leaderThe instant the ball rolled between Bill Buckner’s legs New England broke into a collective moan. Mets fans uncontrollably squealed with glee. Then it was over and there was only silence. Local taverns packed with people watching Game 6 of the 1986 World Series suddenly filled with malice and fans walked away leaving money on the table. Boston’s long awaited world championship was there—and then it was gone. All that remained for Red Sox fans was the grim certainty of an inevitable loss in Game 7 and more proof that this was not the year.
The Red Sox didn’t have a chance. This team and its fans didn’t recover from such defeats. Never had and never would.*¹
Sports fans have a tendency to get attached to the games, the players, the seasons. The players, larger than life, are personal heroes; they pull the curtain back on greatness and let their fans play a part. But in Boston, that was not to be. For many years, whatever momentary hope Red Sox fans may have had—thinking perhaps this time they could win—was eclipsed by their team’s continual string of losses. It was the conversation in their neighborhoods, their schools, their families, even among their politicians. They knew they’d blown it in 1918 by trading Babe Ruth to the Yankees, and since then they just couldn’t get back to the top. The state of affairs for Red Sox fans was a hard, cold reality—the way it was. The context hovering over them was that “the Sox” weren’t winners. (Luckily, I was a Yankees fan.)
We’re defining context here to mean “a fundamental set of assumptions”—assumptions that are not recognized as assumptions, and that go unquestioned—in which the world happens. When people thought the earth was flat (an analogy that grows old but never dies), that was a context or worldview that limited perception and behavior—how those folks saw the horizon, how far toward the edge they sailed, and so on. Similarly, our way of being a man or a woman, and the possibilities available to us, are given by the assumptions embedded in our culture, our language, and times in which we live. A girl born in the U.S. today would likely inherit a very different possibility for being a woman than a girl born in the 1930s or ’40s—would she be a dot-com mogul or running for president?
So if you consider the premise that the whole world happens inside of the assumptions we hold true (and if you do the math), what becomes apparent is thatcontexts are a mighty and decisive force. Contexts come to us by default, and we live our lives essentially unaware of their existence and of their far-reaching influence. It’s like wearing blinders—we don’t see the contexts themselves, we see only what they allow. These default contexts determine our worldview: what’s possible and not, what’s true and false, what’s right and wrong, what we think we can and can’t do. They travel with us—wherever we are, they are—shaping our behavior, our choices, our lives.
Just as these default contexts can be what keeps us limited and stuck, created orinvented contexts can allow for freedom and power. We’re not talking, however, about substituting one context over another, or finding a better context or the rightcontext. Rather, it’s about becoming aware of and responsible for whatever context we are functioning inside of, and realizing that we have the power not only to invent contexts, but to move freely among them.
History is strewn with examples of times when major advances happened as a result of new contexts being created. Democracy, equality, relativity, human rights—new ways of understanding the world—were at some point, newly distinguished contexts. The Copernican revolution abruptly dislodged humans from the center of the universe, ushering in modern astronomy and the scientific revolution. Newtoninvented gravity (certainly, before Newton, there was a physical force, but he transformed the possibility of that force), enabling us to understand and interact more powerfully with the physical universe. Einstein created relativity—a context that catalyzed modern physics and tells us how nature behaves on the scale of apples, planets, galaxies, and on up. At one time, human rights, as we think of them today, simply didn’t exist. Kings had rights, priests had rights, and the ruling class had rights, but the majority of human beings—and often, certain specific groups within a society—did not. In each of these examples, some person or a group of people saw through or past “the way things were,” or the way they “seemed to have to be.” The act of doing so, and saying so, reshaped the course of events and redefined human experience from then on. And we then began living into those possibilities and the “truth” of the world was transformed.
And so it is with being human. We take for granted that things are a particular way; we think it is our circumstances, our cultures, the content of our lives that determine our experience. And if we want some kind of change in our lives, we usually go to work on changing the circumstances—essentially moving the contentaround. (Not surprisingly, we then end up living content-driven lives.)
Living from an invented context has just as much impact and command value as living from a default context—the difference, however, is the difference between a life of predictability and a life of possibility. The answer to the question “what’s possible in being human?” doesn’t need to be looked at through a default lens. Seeing past our old assumptions about “the way things have been” or the way we thought “they had to be” and creating a context of our own choosing alters the very nature of what’s possible—and the truth of “our” world gets transformed.
An invented context is essentially a realm of possibility. And we have the wherewithal to create that realm simply by our saying so. Language—what we say (silently or aloud, once or repeatedly, to ourselves or to others)—has the power to shape reality. When we know our conversations constitute who we are, it shifts our relationship to the world. The shift does not necessarily get rid of the lens or filters or mindsets per se, but what occurs is that those old assumptions simply stop defining who we are. Context known in that way is never inherited, never a matter of acculturation, never a matter of something we picked up, never a matter of accident—it’s always and only a matter of our choosing. Choice is a uniquely human condition. “The stone and the tiger have no choice of life: the stone must gravitate and the tiger must pounce. Only human beings are faced with the mind-boggling responsibility of having, at each and every moment of their lives, to choose what to do and what to be. It is both a necessity and an invitation.”*²
In 2007 the Red Sox became World Series Champions for the second time in three years—and had the most dominant postseason run in history.
*¹Glenn Stout, Boston Baseball, September 2004
*² Harry Eyres, “Tyranny of Choice,” Financial Times, 11/2/07 (citing Jose Ortega y Gasset, in his essay “The Mission of the Librarian”)
The Landmark Education newsletter, for graduates of The Landmark Forum, is a quarterly newsletter offering articles from Landmark Forum leaders, stories by Landmark Forum graduates, and other Landmark Education news. Go to the Landmark Education newsletter
Thank you for your participation with Landmark Education.
Copyright © 2008 Landmark Education LLC. All Rights Reserved.
This newsletter is provided for your personal use only. Any other use, reproduction, modification or further distribution is expressly prohibited under national and international copyright laws. No quotes from these materials may be used in any way in whole or in part without prior written permission.
www.landmarkeducation.com
Tuesday, August 3, 2010
Mind & Body
Monday, August 2, 2010
Dealing with a break-down
Saturday, July 31, 2010
A breakdown
What is completion?
- Accepting that someone was right in the past and you were wrong, even if you still don't feel that way. Nope that is not it!
- Telling the person that you always thought him to be stupid/ bad/ whatever. Not necessarily.
To my act
"Oh, I know you're still there... cause I can feel you dying. I can hear you tapping me... for a little nutrition. Now who's looking for a fix? It gets a little tight in here, do you? Well, you're not wrong... cause the walls are moving in. No food here. Not today, sunshine. My eyes are open and the restaurant's closed. Jog on. Slide off. Find someone else to fill your pipe. Someone, who won't see you coming... or know, when you're there."
Approval Junkies
Friday, July 30, 2010
Enlightenment
I drank some potent bhaang, earlier this year. Now what bhaang does to you is, it allows you to focus your mental faculties on a particular thing. And it is very difficult to un-focus your mind then. I just happened to just notice that my brain was behaving in the most wonderful fashion. It was drawing connections all over my mind. Every incident of my mind was seemingly getting connected to some other incident, all in random fashion. It was superb. So I just began exploring the working of the mind. In the end I arrived at the conclusion that my mind was the creator of this world. My mind was everything. Nothing else existed or mattered.
All that may sound like some drug induced madness, but I remember clearly deducing everything. Each step was a logical step after the last one. It seemed maddening and wonderful at the same time.
I happened to come across a text on Vipassana meditation then, which was again based on the mind-body connection and the power of the mind over everything else. It was very interesting.
During the Landmark Forum, and the advanced course I realized how powerful the mind is. It builds a prison, lives in it, and then laments that is has been imprisoned. It is wonderful how it works. Is it the avoidance of mind exercise that leads us in that direction? It is my guess. The mind is so afraid of the labor of thinking excessively, that is simply makes up a world of it's own. It alters the reality for itself, gives reasons and meanings in everything, and then lives in it without exercise, fat and comfortable.
From Revolver:
“You do all the hard work, and I just help you along. The art is for me to feed pieces to you and let you believe you took those pieces because you are smarter and I am dumber. In every game and con there is always an opponent and a victim. The more control a victim thinks he has, the less he actually has. Gradually he will hang himself. I as the opponent just help him along.”
“the formula has infinite depth in its efficacy and application. But it is staggeringly simple and completely consistent. Rule one of any game or con, you can only get smarter by playing a smarter opponent. The more sophisticated the game, the more sophisticated the opponent. If the opponent is very good, he will place his victim inside an environment he can control. The bigger the environment, the easier the control. Toss the dog a bone, find their weakness, give them just a little of what they think they want. So the opponent simply distracts the victim by getting them consumed with their own consumption. The bigger the trick, and older the trick, the easier it is to pull. They think it cant be that old, and it can’t be that big, for so many people to have fallen for it. Eventually, when the opponent is challenged or questioned, it means the victim's investment and thus his intelligence is questioned. No-one can accept that. Not even to themselves. You’ll always find a very good opponent in the last place you would ever look.”
Who are you?
Are you your body? This meat bag? What if you lose a hand? Will you be a little less of you? No? Then who are you?
Are your your thoughts? What if someone puts a gun to your head? Your thoughts will change immediately. But you won't. Then who are you?
You are not your body. You have a body.
You are not your thoughts. You have thoughts.
Does 'I' really die? Or is it just the body?
I had read concept before Landmark. I had partially understood it then. I am still trying to grip it. But the concept in itself is very powerful. For if you know the real you, would you ever let the act play? Would there be any misery then? Nisargadatta Maharaj and a few more like him claim to have achieved enlightenment even, just pondering on the question: "Who am I?".
Thursday, July 29, 2010
Sympathy
Wednesday, July 28, 2010
The possibility of love
Catching the act
What is Landmark Education?
Tuesday, July 27, 2010
The act
Crisis
Reality
What I got from the Landmark Advanced Course & Forum
- A breakthrough in the way my business was going and the way I felt about it.
- A change in how I felt when I met new people.
- To have an intimate relationship with someone.
- I realized that the way I felt about my business had every thing to do with how I felt about my dad.
- I then realized that how I felt about other people had everything to do with my act. Infact, every time I felt powerful or powerless was due to my act. It is wonderful how when your act gives you power, you start to rely on it, and then it takes away your power too. It is like someone you consider your best friend stabs you in your back. "The greatest con he ever pulled was making you believe he is you".
- I finally have what it takes to work on beginning an intimate relationship. How I go from there is to be seen.
- I have realized that from the Business point of view, probably, me and my father's Visions are not the same. That is a major worry. Unless that is aligned, we can not continue doing this. And I feel no fear in the eventuality of us going separate ways in terms of Business.
- "From nothing, who I am right now, is the possibility of transformation & happiness".
- I want to go on and become an Introduction Leader now, to enroll everyone in the possibility of happiness through transformation.